The future of Style

At work, one of the things I’m working on is a better way for information to flow to people. Since the one thing I know they will have always running is their email client, we’ve developed a solution that uses RSS feeds and an aggregator that runs inside the email client.
This seems to work well and I’m pushing for more advancement in this area.
I was playing around with the new Atom feed and started wondering why it displayed the way it did. I talked with Yoshi at work and he and I looked at the XML a bit. I asked why the stylesheet wasn’t referenced. After thinking a bit, he explained that the style information was an attribute of just one type of content that could be syndicated via Atom. To call it out specifically was wrong since it didn’t apply to all types of content. He said there must be a way to point at the CSS in another way, but he hadn’t looked at the Atom spec much.
We looked at the Joi Ito post about including CSS info in a RSS feed. We weren’t sure if this was a ‘good thing’.
A bit later Yoshi emailed me the following:

After some research, it appears that this approach is invalid. I quote:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#edef-LINK
“This element defines a link. Unlike A, it may only appear in the HEAD section of a document, although it may appear any number of times. Although LINK has no content, it conveys relationship information that may be rendered by user agents in a variety of ways (e.g., a tool-bar with a drop-down menu of links).”

When I got home, I logged onto #joiito and started asking a few questions. I was soundly beaten up for suggesting that CSS and syndication even belonged in the same sentence. I argued that the layout and design of information was important. Mark Pilgrim, who’s opinion I respect, pointed me to his thoughts about Styles in syndication. He’s against it. I understand his reasoning, but I think the need remains. He suggested that style attributes be used instead of full CSS.
After putting the kids to bed, talking to the wife, and watching and episode of Angels in America with her, I headed back online.
In the mean time, Joi’s post went white hot with comments on the topic and Mamamusings made a great post about the topic. Anil Dash, always one step ahead, was mentioning this a year ago.
It appears that I stumbled onto the issue just as it is ‘being revisited’.
People on both sides make valid points. It’s good to be surrounded byt smart people.
My take is simple. For syndication to be truly successful, there must be a good way for style information to travel with the syndicated content.
The need for style info is more than wanting blue text instead of black text. For Atom to be more than a weblog tool and really shine as an information transfer platform, it needs to be capable of fufilling a range of needs beyond text & links. IMHO, Jason Shellen has a good proposal.

Let’s get this straight

Proper usage rules about weblog and blogging terms:
A weblog is the online, regularly updated presence of a person or group. Do not use ‘blog’.
A blogger is a person who authors the weblog. Do not use ‘webblogger’.
Blogging is what a blogger does when actively authoring for their weblog. Do not use ‘webblogging’.
The totality of weblogs and weblogs as a community is known as the Blogosphere.
Ignore this information at your own peril.

Why bloggers blog

Several people have been talking about why they blog and what they need to reveal or hide. Both Joi and Casey have been discussing it.
After a bit of thought, blogging is really about one thing and one thing only. Getting recognition. To those of us down with Transactional Analysis, it’s all about the warm fuzzies.
People crave attention and praise more than anything else in life. More than money or possessions.
Bloggers love comments. Bloggers love getting side emails. Bloggers love Trackbacks and links to their weblogs.
Sure, there are some people (like me) that have the secondary goal of spreading some information or knowledge around, but the primary goal remains getting attention.
Let’s be honest here folks. Bloggers will change their weblog in the direction that gets them more eyeballs, clicks, links, and comments.
The difficulty is riding the line between what people want to know and what will cause you more trouble in life.
Feel free to disagree, I love the comments. 🙂

Spam/Virii/Slash?

Today, my inbox recieved a strange email.
The email was identified as a virus, W32.Mimail.M@mm to be exact.
I looked at the text of the message and it began with, “No one in bed is better than you Gollum.”
Wowsa. A combo virus attack and LotR slash fiction all in one. A true sign of the apocalypse.

Quicksilver

Last week I finished Quicksilver and it has taken me a week to decide what I thought about the book.
The book is not science fiction, it is historical fiction taking place in the period after the English Civil War up until the start of the 18th century, encompassing the European Wars and scientific innovation of the time.
On one level the book is good historical fiction with great characters and good story telling. But what I was looking for was the deeper ideas of the novel. In Stephenson’s other novels, there is an underlying idea (or ideas) that is being presented. In the Diamond Age, the importance of education is stressed. In Cryptonomicon, the importance of secrecy is stressed.
It took me a week to figure out what Stephenson was getting at in the book. I read several reviews, including a good one from Slashdot, and tried to find someone else I knew that had read it.
Key to the story are two main concepts, the role of religious fundamentalism and the role of scientific innovation. Much of the English Civil War was based on the concepts of gathered churches vs. established churches. The debate over the ‘Purity’ of the Church left the realm of discussion and lead to open warfare.
The second concept of scientific innovation or as it known in the book as Natural Philosophy. At this point in history, science and the scientific method was finally taking hold and groups like the Royal Society were forming to combine individual efforts into greater projects. Change was occurring rapidly and causing change in the marketplace and the battlefield. The world was changing faster than it had in hundreds of years and the it appeared to have no end in sight.
Now consider the world of the early 21st century. Religious disagreement and fundamentalist thought has broken out into worldwide violence after a period of relative calm since WWII. Science and the daily use of technology is ramping up logarithmically. There appears to be no end in sight for new innovations pouring out of the scientific minds in the world. From genetics to computers to aerospace to media, what we take for granted today was almost unimaginable 30 years ago.
I think this is the point Stephenson is trying to make. I believe that he is trying to compare the world of today to what happened in the late 1600s in Europe. Religion and traditional thought in conflict with science, technology and the general idea of change.
A few specific associations. Half Cocked Jack can represent the hard working third world that may not be literate, but is bright, resourceful, and steadfast. The Newton/Leibniz rivalry can represent the struggle between competing technologies for marketplace dominance.
This first book in the Baroque Cycle (trilogy) is setting the stage for what happens in the next two novels. Looking forward to the release of the next book, I can only hope that I am correct and that there is more to Quicksilver than simply a good adventure yarn.
Of course, I could be full of crap and totally missing the point…

Widening circles

One of the online areas I lurk in is the Joi Ito IRC channel. I was told that AKMA was coming to Pasadena and asked if I could help him out. AKMA is A. K. M. Adams, he’s just called AKMA by everyone. I had heard of AKMA before but had never really chatted with him or even really read his weblog.
We chatted briefly on Sunday night and on Monday morning decided to grab breakfast together. I wasn’t sure what to expect. AKMA is a theologian and a priest. I’m an Engineer. Faith & Science. Can the two mix?
Happily, they can. We had a great chat and it was wonderful to expand the circle of my friends. He had eggs and pancakes, I had French Toast, and we both had coffee.
I am not a religious man. I prefer logic, reason, and method over faith and belief. Why? No real reason. I’ve come to see it simply as the way my mind works and accepts things. The conversation suprised me at the depth of topics within the world of philosphy.
I was content to categorize theology as a simple science of debate over a minutae and other trivial matters while the big picture things were agreed upon. That is not the case. I was interested to see that AKMA had to deal with many of the same issues I deal with in business, that he deals with in religion. Ego, power, control, even branding.
We agreed on that the connectivity of the internet is changing some of the base assumptions about what a community is, how it works, and what a friend is.
Next time, I hope to meet over beers and get an even more lively discussion going.