Brief sentence that states an opinion that is diametrically opposed to the writer's previous views.
Acknowledgment that the writer had held opposing views in the past, but now has truly, honestly changed their ways.
More lying about the writer's new views on the a topic in an attempt to confuse the reader and convince them of a dramatic change of heart. Simple rationale based on the writing of others, using phases and terminology that have been previously mocked by the writer.
Impassioned speech regarding the new passion surrounding the previously rejected belief, going on at length to just how much the reader has been transformed into their thinking.
Image that goes further to illustrate the joke, attempted to cement it in reality.
Summary of previous explanations and final attempt to truly fool the reader into believe that the post on April 1st is true and note a joke.
Posted by michael at April 01, 2009 05:44 AMThe reader has no clue what the writer is talking about.
Posted by: Tryphoon [http://Www.tryphoon.com] on April 1, 2009 6:56 AMComment pointing out how clever I am to have seen through it all immediately and ruining any bit of the joke for others with BIG CAPITAL LETTERS.
Posted by: Andre Torrez [http://notes.torrez.org/] on April 1, 2009 10:52 AMImpassioned reply that post is truthful and that April 1st is a mere coincidence.
Posted by: Michael [http://cruftbox.com] on April 1, 2009 2:21 PMTrackback entry indicating that blogger has completely missed the point of the post and used it to fulfill need for blog content.
Posted by: Ken [http://emmanate.org] on April 1, 2009 5:09 PMSo, is this like "Gödel, Escher and Bach go into a bar..."?
Posted by: Otito Gojito [http://www.overhere.com] on April 2, 2009 5:38 PMhahaha
Posted by: Cris [http://www.crawfish.com/] on April 7, 2009 10:06 PM